What is Cellulosic Biofuel?

Lately researchers are looking for every possible alternative energy source, this due largely to the world's energy crisis and the condition of the environment. The top of the list is replacing traditional fossil fuels with alternative and renewable energy.

The main contenders for fuel substitutes are biomass fuels. Biomass fuels are derived from organic plant matter. Ethanol-based bio fuels are extracted from corn. Biodiesel is made up primarily of used vegetable oil and grease. Jatropha oil, which comes from seeds from the Jatropha plant, is also being used to make biofuels. Now added to the list is cellulosic biofuel.

Cellulosic biofuel is very revolutionary in biofuels; this is because it is not plant specific as with Jatropha and and can be generated from both living and dead organic plant matter rather than requiring crops to be grown specifically for the purpose of cellulosic biofuel production, such as ethanol needs corn.

The carbon content in cellulose is what makes it such a good candidate in the quest for biofuel. Cellulose is the most abundant carbon form present in biomass and accounts for around 50% of its weight. Cellulose can be found in most plant matter without the need for land space or water for irrigation giving cellulose biofuel its appeal.

Cellulose is a polysaccharide comprised of a six sugar carbon polymer. Because of its composition and its abundance, cellulosic biofuel is an attractive possibility for mass biofuel production.

The researchers at NASA are further exploring cellulosic biofuel as a viable fuel source. They are researching more efficient processes to convert cellulose to sugar. Once cellulose is converted to its sugar-based form it can be used for other purposes such as chemical agents, food and cellulosic biofuel.

However, the conversion to sugar is requires around 50 hours for the process to take place. You take labor costs and the energy to covert it, and you can see how costly it can become. With time also comes higher production costs. If it would be pssible to cut this process down to 5 hours it would see cellulosic biofuel become cost effective enough to be competitive in a global market.

What scientists hope to accomplish is to refine the process for easier extraction of the complex sugars from cellulose. Because the plant cell walls were designed in nature to be robust and to stand up to the elements, it makes it difficult to break down and extract. Researchers hope to make extraction easier by engineering plant cell walls.

Another hurdle in the production of cellulosic biofuel involves the improvement in enzyme efficiency. They plan to mimic enzyme behavior from animals that are the most efficient at breaking down cell walls such as herbivores like cows and sheep which they believe is the key to cost effective cellulosic biofuel production.

Some of the things we can do to help protect ourselves from increasing oil prices is to conserve what we have now, to use less, and to alter our energy consuming patterns. We need to look into alternative energy sources when they become available to us. If we do these things, cellulosic biofuel could be on the market in as little as 5 years.

Want to get more information on biofuels and renewable energies?
http://www.renewable-energyadvantages.com

Paul Hundrieser
http://www.paulhundrieser.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Paul_Hundrieser

Read More..

Grassoline - A New Biofuel Niche

During the warm seasons, people around the world cut the grass in their yard and rarely think anything else of it. The shards pile up in clumps around the yard or near the curb and some days the wind even blows them into the neighbor's yard. What many do not realize is that these shards of grass laying around the yard could actually be used as fuel for your car and other engine types. The actual name for this biofuel is called grassoline and it has caught the interest of environmentalists all over the world.

One benefit of grassoline would of course be that the yard would look a lot better without the grass clippings scattered all over the place. A person would not have to go through bagging them up for the local town to pick them up, or stare at them until the wind whips them away. But grassoline was not invented just for the purpose of making yards look a little nicer. The concept was created because there is already a similar vegetation out there that is currently being made into biofuel and that's ethanol from corn. Ethanol is currently being used and tested to fuel vehicles and other engines. It is environmentally safer than gasoline and diesel, which are currently being used in the U.S. to power most vehicles.

Unfortunately, a person won't be able to empty their lawnmower bag quite yet and fill up their gas tanks with the broken down grass. Using grass as a biofuel is one of several products being tested right now. Algae is another one being tested and it looks like it is going to be a long way off before the industry decides on the right biofuel and sticks with it.

Using grass, corn and other natural vegetation in order to power engines is something that is being done to lower the amount of greenhouse gases being leaked into the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases help deplete the ozone layer and contribute to global warming. With all of the concern regarding the environment and the ozone layer, biofuel is a market trend that is going to continue to be studied.

For more information on grassoline and other biofuels, see http://www.theinternettimemachine.com.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Vanessa_Sweeney

Read More..

Homemade Energy - Is Bio Fuel Bad?

Anybody who has followed the discussions about alternative energy sources with any regularity knows about the controversy that arose over the issue regarding biofuels. Biofuels are inefficient, drive up food prices and cost more both at the pump and through increased taxation for government subsidies of rural farmers such as John Deere and Caterpillar Corporations. (Together, the amount of money they receive in government agricultural subsidies alone would make most rural farmers green with envy and red with anger)

So does that mean that biofuel is really as bad as some people are saying? Well the fact is that corn is one of the largest government subsidized crops in the nation and as such, the government has more freedom to regulate it than they do any other crop and they can then pass on the money to political action committees and other special interest groups. However, when you take the politics out of power, you come up with something resembling pond scum. (No, we are not saying that politicians resemble pond scum, the pond scum is actually useful)

A company by the name of Algenol has found a way to tap into pond scum that is used to create some amazingly effective biofuels. Unlike corn, not many people are standing in line waiting to buy some of that sweet green algae so food prices remain unaffected with this method of producing biofuels. Additionally, the algae is easily farmed and grows at a fairly rapid rate, is fully renewable and (insert audible gasp here) actually makes an efficient and viable biofuel alternative.

The Algenol has lots of different benefits. Here is some of them.

1. Doesn't need to use live feedstock.
2. Doesn't need to collect the materials.
3. Doesn't require environment damaging fertilizers.
4. Uses the water of the sea meaning that we don't need to waste our drinking water.
5. Uses only a small amount of fossil fuels for the process.
6. No need to plow the land.
7. Desertic land and Sea side land can be used for the production.
8. Algenol has energy balance over 5.5:1 making it powerful than fossil fuels.

So what does all of that mean?

That means that all of the tests to date have shown this to be a viable method for creating biofuels that are clean, efficient and have no adverse affect on people who are having a hard enough time finding decent corn on the store shelves. In other words, no matter what your personal or political stance may be, there is absolutely no reason to protest this algae based bio fuel. All of the arguments both for and against bio fuels and alternative fuels in the past have been squashed by pond scum.

While it may be true that many bio fuels are not all that they are cracked up to be, that does not mean that some of them are not very likely to at least supplement, if not to replace the more traditional fossil fuels. One thing is for certain; when people can produce energy cheaper, more efficiently and in an environmentally friendly manner as well as getting it to the end consumer at a more reasonable rate, this will start getting people's attention. As long as we can keep the people out of the pond scum, we should be okay!

David Y Gonzalez is an expert in Diy Solar Panels and has been working with Green Diy Energy for more than 2 years. He has helped lots of people to save energy with homemade energy and people have been able to save money and the environment.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Y_Gonzalez

Read More..

Biofuel Can Help the Planet Now and in the Future

In recent years, we have been encouraged to take on more collective responsibility when it comes to the environment. Mankind has damaged the planet in so many ways over the centuries that it's become vitally important that we look to repair the damage we've already done.

It's become common practice to recycle as much of our household and industrial waste as possible, and every month more and more people are joining this quiet, and much-needed, revolution. Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind and wave, are serious alternatives to fossil fuels these days, too.

The rise in the use of biofuel is perhaps not as well-known, but thanks to some intensive research and development, it is set to play a major part in the fight against environmental damage. It's likely to be a significant source of energy in the coming years, and will become something we're all aware of in the very near future.

Basically, biofuels are obtained from renewable resources, which can include plant and animal by-products. They've become more popular - and necessary, for that matter - because of the rise in oil prices and the need to find an alternative to petrol and diesel. They fall into two main categories.

The first, bioethanol, is developed mainly from sugar and starch crops. It's an alcohol, and can be used to propel vehicles. However, it's currently utilised primarily as an additive to gasoline. It helps to lower dangerous emissions, and is set to become more widely used in the more developed countries.

Biodiesel is perhaps more familiar, and will be even more so in the coming years. It's manufactured from animal fats, recycled grease and vegetable oils. Although, like bioethanol, it can be used to power vehicles, at the moment it's added to diesel in order to make it kinder to the environment.

Both biofuels have been developed as a result of major investment, and will become a credible alternative to the more damaging fuel sources we currently use. They will one day play a major role in industry and in the home, as well as on the country's roads.

More and more countries are recognising the need for implementing the use of biofuels, and many have targets to aim for which, it is hoped, will lead to major reductions in the use of fossil fuels over the coming years.

In the European Union, for example, each member state is expecting that biofuel usage will be at least 5.75% of all traffic fuel used by the year 2010. In 2020, that figure is expected to increase to 10%.

The USA offers tax exemptions for companies that develop biofuel technology, and the country has seen a significant change in attitudes over the last decade. American ethanol fuels are obtained from corn, a major crop that has been harvested for many years.

In recent times, a significant number of governments have developed major environmental programmes, reflecting a growing awareness of the need to protect our planet. Developing usable biofuels is just one of the many initiatives that are helping to make our world a greener one.

More and more governments are making major investments in biofuel technology, which in the next few years will become an increasingly important energy source.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Robert_Yates

Read More..

Questions About Biofuels’ Environmental Costs Could Alter Europe’s Policies

BRUSSELS — A top European farm official has suggested that yet-to-be-released studies by the European Commission could be used to “kill” heavily promoted and subsidized biofuels by focusing on their total environmental impact.

The biofuel company Choren Industries, based in Freiberg, Germany, makes clean fuel for vehicles and power generation. The suggestion, written in the margins of internal correspondence seen by The International Herald Tribune, could foreshadow a further retreat from the biofuel-friendly policies that the commission once called crucial in the fight against climate change.

The industry has already been dogged by contentions that the main justification for policies supporting biofuels — that they are greener than fossil-based products — is unsound. Many environmental advocates claim that a large number of fuels grown from crops do not merit public subsidies or production incentives.

European governments agreed in December 2008 that only biofuels that reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 35 percent compared with fossil fuels should qualify for meeting the trade bloc’s current goal.

But at the time, the governments directed the commission to investigate indirect land use change and, depending on the findings, to decide whether any changes needed to be made about which biofuels counted toward the goal.

The commission’s studies are intended to determine the volume of emissions created when forest or land is cleared to replace food production lost to biofuel crops. Converting land can release large amounts of greenhouse gases when vegetation is cleared. Plowing also exposes carbon stored in the soil to the air. In the lumbering jargon of emissions experts, these effects are known as indirect land use change, or I.L.U.C.

In a memorandum, Jean-Luc Demarty, the top civil servant in the agriculture department at the European Commission, wrote to a colleague in December that “an unguided use of I.L.U.C. would kill biofuels in the E.U.”

His words suggest that most of the models in the studies used for calculating emissions would rule out fuels made from crops currently produced in the European Union. That, he added in the handwritten note, “is probably the objective” of those who oppose incentives for some forms of biofuels.

Mr. Demarty declined to comment on Thursday, but other officials did not dispute the authenticity of the note. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that a number of biofuels would still meet emissions limits even after land-use changes resulting from increased biofuel demand.

But in the case of corn-based ethanol, the agency said that manufacturers would need to use “advanced efficient technologies” during production to meet American limits.

In Europe, commission officials are seeking to protect influential agricultural and industrial interests while maintaining a credible climate policy.

A spokeswoman for the European Commission, Marlene Holzner, declined to comment on what she termed internal working documents.

A group of environmental activists and lawyers made the European Commission document available to The International Herald Tribune this week. They contend the studies will support the case for using fewer biofuels and want the commission to release them.

Transport and Environment, a nonprofit group based in Brussels, first requested that the studies be released nearly four months ago.

Ms. Holzner said that the request’s “wide scope” meant it was “not possible to check all the relevant material” within the normal deadline for releasing documents. Under European Union rules, the commission has an obligation to respond to information requests, but may not necessarily grant them. Ms. Holzner, however, said a “first batch” of studies should be made available next week.

European governments agreed in December 2008 that only biofuels that reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 35 percent compared with fossil fuels should qualify for meeting the trade bloc’s current target.

But at the time, the governments directed the commission to investigate indirect land use change and, depending on the findings, decide whether any changes needed to be made about which biofuels counted toward the target.

Amandine Lecourt, the spokeswoman for the European Biodiesel Board, said negative effects on emissions from indirect land use change were “still unproved.”
By JAMES KANTER

Read More..

For Adult Males

Most of the Enzyte reviews on the different websites present a different picture of the product. Some of the Enzyte reviews do not even tell what this product is all about. It is a spell-binding product without any noteworthy side effects. The effectiveness of the product is actually judged by the positive feedback by the users. The more is the positive feedback the better it is in its action.

Enzyte male sexual enhancer for men is known as a natural supplement and not as a drug. Therefore under the law, the company or the brand is not required to prove the supplement's effectiveness. Enzyte claims that their men's sexual health alternative supplement is proven to be safer and more effective compared to Viagra. .

Enzyte consist of variety of minerals, herbs and vitamins, which are deemed effective and safe for human consumption. However, another ingredient involved in this controversial natural health supplement product is the African tree extract. African tree extract is commonly found in many premature ejaculation treatment drugs and erectile dysfunction medications. So definitely use this product is safe and proven

Read More..

Crude Oil Price Forecast Using Technical Analysis

There can be little question that energy costs have profound effects on all areas of the economy. Leading up to the Market top and subsequent crash in 2008, oil prices rose to unprecedented levels. It could be said that rising energy costs has as profound an impact on the economy as the credit default swap scandal.

That said, it would make sense to track and forecast crude oil prices as part of your high level market analysis process. Fortunately, it is perfect legitimate and effective to apply technical analysis techniques to oil prices, making it possible for traders to determine near term price movements in crude.

Using charting software such as stockcharts.com, traders can analyze chart patterns and apply technical indicators to predict the future direction and degree of movement. I recommend utilizing Monthly charts for determining the overall trend of crude, and weekly charts for examining chart patterns and daily charts for confirming pattern breakouts using technical analysis indicators.

One aspect of forecasting oil prices is that crude oil tends to trend, making it very easy to trade profitably. For instance, crude oil has been in a steady uptrend, creating a positive slopped support trendline at points in July, late September, and early December. This is a valid and strong trendline which suggest that crude will continue to rise.

Crude also tends to trade in channels and triangles. A break above or below these pattern lines suggests a large move is coming in crude. As of the writing of this article, crude oil recently crossed above its' 200 day exponential moving average, as well as broke out of the topside of a symmetrical continuation triangle. With little resistance overhead, it is quite reasonable that crude oil will continue to rise from it's current price of $83 / barrel, to over $96 per barrel.

As a technical trader, I usually don't spend much time talking about market fundamentals. However, there are some underlying forces that can never be ignored when doing market forecasts. Clearly the price of crude oil has had a profound effect on the stock market over the past 5 years.

You can clearly see that $70 crude oil caused the markets to slow down, eventually creating the tell tale double top. Once crude crossed $90 per barrel, the S&P 500 crashed through the 1400 support level, and the previous bull market which lasted nearly 6 years came to a screeching halt. Will it happen again? It's quite possible.

Follow Crude Oil Price Forecasts at the RecordPriceBreakout.com blog provided by Steve Warshaw, The Trade Detective, or follow him on Twitter

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steve_Warshaw

Read More..

Experienced

Maybe this is experienced by many children under the age of 7 years, which is difficult to eat or eat a little enthusiasm, because at this age a child would rather play than eat, even children can forget the time when you're busy playing. I also experienced this, what my mom did? he gave me fishoil. When I asked why I had to drink it, she said let's appetite increases (my body was still thin).

Fish oil It was shown to increase appetite, after I drank my dinner again increased morale, and sometimes eat up to 4 times. After 2 to three months are always the desire to eat will come back again, that's when we drink fishoil back. So drink fishoil not just once but it takes some time until we wake up your appetite.
Fish oil but can also be used for adults, to increase the desire to eat more and also keep the body's metabolism. If you've eaten too much, instead of our parents are anxious .... Understandably eat increases ... inventory should also be added.

Read More..

The Underutilized Forest and Wood Biofuel

As people are waiting for "them" to make biofuel available as a source of energy there are many of us who have been using forest biofuel to heat our homes for generations. This biofuel is sold on the free market without government subsidies or a need for more research and development.

Wood can be made into many biofuel products like methane, alcohol, or diesel and it can be burned directly to power electric generators to produce electricity. All of these are expensive and energy intensive. After refining wood into these biofuels the cost and energy used has not made wood biofuel a viable source of energy. The exception to that is burning wood to generate electricity which has experienced some commercial success.

What people often overlook is a form of wood biofuel that requires very little or no processing and that is wood as a heating fuel. While people are waiting for biofuel they are still using fossil fuels to heat their homes when they could switch today to an economically proven biofuel heat source which is to burn wood.

Since there is little or no processing required, direct heating with wood is more efficient than turning wood into another fuel such as diesel or electricity. The raw material is directly converted to the desired product which is heat.

The most basic form of wood biofuel is simple firewood for wood stoves and fireplaces. This is a very desirable form of energy for many homes but it's not for everyone. Burning firewood does have some disadvantages such as wood handling, it can be messy and can produce smoke. Although modern wood stoves have come a long way in reducing emissions and efficiency. Modern wood stoves can burn with no visible smoke. Burning firewood is not as convenient as other heat sources since you have to continually feed fuel into the fire.

The alternative to fireplaces and firewood stoves is wood pellet stoves. Wood pellets require more processing but pellet stoves are more efficient than firewood stoves so it makes up for the difference. A pellet stove combines the use of renewable biofuel with the convenience of traditional electric, gas or oil heating systems.

Pellet stoves have automatic fuel feeding systems and are thermostatically controlled. Wood pellets are available today and have been proven as a heat source that is competitive and can even cost less than fossil fuels.

Both firewood and wood pellets are available as a practical source of forest biofuel that you can start using today. Which one you choose depends on your situation and preferences.

Learn more about wood pellets and learn more about firewood as biofuels.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Michael_A_Wilson

Read More..

HOME :: Investing / Futures-and-Commodities How To Invest In Crude Oil Futures And Options By MK Smith Article Word Count: 430 [View Summary] Comme

Many people believe that the prices of crude oil futures and unleaded gas futures are too cheap at the current levels for various reasons but do not know how to invest in energy futures and options.

What is a crude oil futures option? A crude oil futures option is the right but not the obligation to buy (call) or sell (put) 1000 barrels of crude oil for a certain price (strike price) by a certain period of time (expiration date). The option buyer pays a premium for this right. A hypothetical example might be buying 1 June $65 crude oil futures call option for a premium cost of $1000. Keep in mind that premium cost does not include commissions and any related fees. The premium paid and the commissions and fees are the maximum risk of capital loss that an option purchaser might sustain. The person speculating on this particular crude oil futures call option is hoping for the price of June crude oil futures to increase enough for them to sell (offset) the option for a profit anytime before the option expires.

There are various futures contracts that are closely related to crude oil futures because they are made from crude oil such as heating oil futures and unleaded gas futures. An unleaded gas futures option gives the option buyer the right but not the obligation to buy (call) or sell (put) 42,000 gallons of unleaded gas for a certain price (strike) by a certain period of time (expiration date). A hypothetical example might be buying 1 July $1.80 unleaded gas futures call option for $900. Once again, the premium cost does not include commissions and fees. The premium paid and the commissions and fees are the maximum risk of capital loss that an option purchaser might sustain. The option speculator is hoping for the price of July unleaded gas futures to increase enough for them to sell (offset) their option for a profit anytime before the option expiration date.

Crude oil futures options and unleaded gas futures options investing are very risky and are not suitable for all investors. Buying options can lead to the loss of the entire amount invested.

Why are crude oil futures contract prices quoted in barrels and heating oil futures and unleaded gas futures contracts are quoted in gallons? One barrel of crude oil is 42 gallons so the contracts are actually leveraging the same amount of petroleum or the products. It is less confusing to have different contract quotes for the distillates of crude oil and the crude oil itself.

The author of this article has 13 plus years of commodity option trading experience and wishes to educate investors so they can make prudent investment decisions based on a deeper knowledge of the option markets before they risk their hard earned money. Future option trading is not for everyone and only risk capital should be used when investing. Visit http://www.tkfutures.com/education.htm to learn more.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=MK_Smith

Read More..